Sponsored Links

 

Movie Series - Aladdin

This is a film series created by Disney. The first film was released in 1992 and was followed by two direct-to-video sequels.

Wikipedia Link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aladdin_(film)
eBay Link: View Aladdin on eBay

Boned When... (Login to Submit a Reason)

#ReasonWhy?VotesVote
1 Return of Jafar Disney does not know how to make Sequels
34
Please Login to Vote
2 Death - Jafar A huge mistake made to a great villain
9
Please Login to Vote
3 Same character/different actor Dan Castellaneta instead of Robin Williams
9
Please Login to Vote
4 Never Boned Still rocks.
8
Please Login to Vote
5 King of Thieves A threequel? Come on!
6
Please Login to Vote
6 Disney made Iago a good guy He was more entertaining as a villain
2
Please Login to Vote
7 Day 1 Sucked from the start.
1
Please Login to Vote
8 Unboned Boned in R. of Jafar, Unboned in King of Thieves
1
Please Login to Vote

Aladdin Comments (You must Login to Comment)

#Comments
1 I can say that the Aladdin sequels are definitely some of the better straight-to-video Disney sequels. -- Submitted By: (cartooner) on March 8, 2013, 6:01 pm - (1 votes) - Login to Vote
2 Return of Jafar was the first, and one of the better Disney DTV sequels. It was good seeing Jafar again with Jonathan Freeman reprising his role. His over the top hamminess was entertaining, proving to be one of the better Disney villains in recent memory. The music wasn't as good as the first but I like songs like "Nothing in the World Like a Friend" and "Second Rate". Most importantly without RoJ, there would not have been an Aladdin series that turned out to be fantastic. Great movie series overall. -- Submitted By: (TrueBackLash) on March 3, 2013, 9:30 pm - (0 votes) - Login to Vote
3 I'm still waiting for "Aladdin 4: Jafar May Need Glasses". -- Submitted By: (Burmy) on April 13, 2010, 9:50 pm - (0 votes) - Login to Vote
4 Return of Jafar had so much wrong with it. Castellaneta's effort was admirable but ultimately inferior to the genius of Robin Williams. The chemistry for it just wasn't there anymore and if there was music, I guarantee you no one remembers any of it. King of Thieves, the third movie, was not that bad. It was kind of fun, and also very nice to have Williams back. But, like everyone else has said, it definitely did not regain any magic of the first movie. Disney will always be the fish-boner when it comes to sequels simply because they make a very strong first installment that essentially works as a stand-alone story, maybe you could continue and tell another but it definitely isn't necessary. Then, they realize they could capitalize on its success and rush to make movies without bothering to think about quality of plot, music, character, dynamic, or dramatically if it even works. Like Cinderella. Does that really need two other sequels to its story? Little Mermaid? Pocahontas? Peter Pan? Jungle Book? Lion King? -- Submitted By: (SamuraiPanda201) on August 11, 2009, 12:36 am - (0 votes) - Login to Vote
5 If they didn't kill off Jafar, he could have been a great antagonist in the cartoon series. Him being turned into a genie made an interesting situation for a villain. The second movie had problems, like Dan Castellaneta instead of Robin Williams. And what gets me the most is that an evil genius like Jafar became a borderline idiot: instead of letting Aladdin fall to his death over the waterfall, he rescues him so he gets the death penalty from the royal guards...but Aladdin winds up being rescued when Iago frees the Genie. Aladdin's death was practically guaranteed if he fell over the waterfall, and there would be nothing or nobody to save him. Saving Aladdin from the waterfall just increased the chances of him being rescued again. And, why did Jafar leave Iago (whom he knew befriended Aladdin and his friends) ALONE with his prisoners? Why didn't he have Abis Maal watch over the prisoners and/or Iago? Why didn't he lock Iago in a cage so he wouldn't be tempted to help his new friends? And when Jafar captured everyone, why didn't he just rule Agrabah then and there? Maybe I am nitpicking, but Jafar's an evil genius. If Aladdin could survive Jafar's evil genius in the first movie, he could surely have survived his evil genius in the second. -- Submitted By: (Robert) on August 6, 2009, 1:59 pm - (0 votes) - Login to Vote
6 Yet another case of "If Disney makes a direct-to-video sequel, somewhere there's a fish with unspeakable things happening to it!" With Aladdin, though, Disney compounded the violation by apparently operating under the delusion that bringing Robin Williams back to voice the genie in the third movie would make everything all right. Sorry, fellas -- didn't work. -- Submitted By: (Mythigator) on July 27, 2009, 6:00 am - (0 votes) - Login to Vote
7 If you think this series still rocked after the Return of Jafar, etc., you suck ass. The Return of Jafar was terrible, and I'm sure Aladdin and the King of Thieves was not so good either. The fact that Robin Williams returned as the voice of the Genie is not an excuse for it still rocking. -- Submitted By: (Marcus) on May 29, 2009, 6:42 am - (-2 votes) - Login to Vote
8 "Sequels" is misspelled in one of the entries on the Aladdin page. http://www.bonethefish.com/viewtopics.php?636 -- Submitted By: (EtherealMutation) on May 28, 2009, 10:56 am - (0 votes) - Login to Vote
9 Being an old school Disney movie series, "Aladdin" never boned/nuked! -- Submitted By: (SVN) on April 17, 2009, 8:52 pm - (1 votes) - Login to Vote
10 The first movie was great. It was one of the first Disney movies to use computer effects. However, Return of Jafar was horrible. The Rescuers Down Under is a fluke, Disney does not make good sequels. Their movies are not sequel worthy. -- Submitted By: (MCS) on April 11, 2009, 8:55 pm - (-1 votes) - Login to Vote

Login to See the QUICK COMMENT Box

BONETHEFISH

Log in to BTF


Register - Forgot password?


Follow on Twitter!

App on Facebook

www.bonethefish.com

Related eBay Auctions

Powered By: TempusMedia - (Page load took:1.03 seconds)