Sponsored Links

 

Music Groups - John Lennon

John Winston Lennon was an English musician and singer-songwriter who rose to worldwide fame as one of the founding members of The Beatles, one of the most commercially successful and critically acclaimed acts in the history of popular music. Along with fellow Beatle Paul McCartney, he formed one of the most successful songwriting partnerships of the 20th century.

Wikipedia Link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Lennon
eBay Link: View John Lennon on eBay

Boned When... (Login to Submit a Reason)

#ReasonWhy?VotesVote
1 Never Boned Still rocks.
15
Please Login to Vote
2 Day 1 Sucked from the start.
2
Please Login to Vote
3 Arrogance Said the Beatles were more popular than Jesus.
2
Please Login to Vote
4 Double album "Sometime in New York City" LP flop
1
Please Login to Vote

John Lennon Comments (You must Login to Comment)

#Comments
1 The only strike he has against him is Yoko Ono. Other than that, I'd have nothing bad to say about the man. Never boned. -- Submitted By: (PYLrulz) on January 11, 2013, 12:18 pm - (0 votes) - Login to Vote
2 Never boned the fish except when he got whipped by Yoko Ono -- Submitted By: (stryker73) on April 10, 2012, 3:15 pm - (0 votes) - Login to Vote
3 Lennon-McCartney together as a songwriting duo and as members of the Beatles never boned. I think John had the curse of leaving this world early as being bone proof. John has been more popular with the media and the public due to being more politically bent than McCartney and the fact that his music wasn't as fluffy as McCartney's once the two went solo. John had more edge, more attitude, thus more mystery, and dying young only added to that aura. McCartney, on the other hand, has continued releasing albums, many with overly cheesy, fluffy music. We've seen him grow old, we've seen him make some controversial decisions (his outspokenness on vegetarianism, his bad marriage to Heather, etc.), and the luster has been chipped. The truth is, John and Paul made each other better and they never were as good apart, not even close. John gave Paul the sneer and attitude his songs needed, and Paul gave John's songs the bounce and optimism they needed. The public remembers John with more favoritism because we didn't see him grow old. We did Paul and because of that we rate John ahead of Paul even though many of the greatest songs in history were created by Paul like Yesterday and Hey Jude. In the end, Paul gets compared to unfairly to John more than he should. -- Submitted By: (kingbk) on March 23, 2012, 7:39 pm - (2 votes) - Login to Vote
4 We need a new category called the unboneable list. Some people, or musical acts, or TV Shows should be unboneable no matter what the vote is. John Lennon should be way up on this list with Paul McCartney and the Beatles and a few others. John was unboneable, no matter about Yoko or saying that the Beatles were more popular than Jesus (he said this because it was a bad thing by the way). -- Submitted By: (JoeBagODonuts) on March 21, 2012, 6:49 pm - (0 votes) - Login to Vote
5 John first two post Beatle LPs were great, but then he boned with his disastrous "Sometime in New York City". I honestly don't think there is one good song on it, and it's a double album! -- Submitted By: (John63btf) on January 13, 2012, 9:39 am - (0 votes) - Login to Vote

Login to See the QUICK COMMENT Box

BONETHEFISH

Log in to BTF


Register - Forgot password?


Follow on Twitter!

App on Facebook

www.bonethefish.com

Related eBay Auctions

Powered By: TempusMedia - (Page load took:0.735 seconds)