Sponsored Links


Movie Series - Jurassic Park

The Jurassic Park franchise is a series of books, films and video games centering on a disastrous attempt to create a theme park of cloned dinosaurs. It began in 1990 when Universal Studios bought the rights to the novel by Michael Crichton before it was even published. The book was successful, as was the 1993 film adaptation which led to two sequels, although the last was not based on a novel, as the previous films were. The software developers Ocean Software, BlueSky Software and Sega of America have had the rights to developing video games since the 1993 film, and numerous games have been produced. Currently a fourth feature film is in the works, but it has been lingering in development hell since a year after the third film. Many rumors have surrounded the project since it was first reported, many surrounding plot and script ideas, and new logos.

Wikipedia Link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jurassic_Park_franchise
eBay Link: View Jurassic Park on eBay

Boned When... (Login to Submit a Reason)

1 Jurassic Park 3 Threequels are rarely worthy, this is no exception
Please Login to Vote
2 Jurassic Park 2 Huge drop off from the first film
Please Login to Vote
3 Never Boned Still rocks.
Please Login to Vote
4 Day 1 Sucked from the start.
Please Login to Vote
5 Unboned - Jurassic World A succesful franchise revival
Please Login to Vote

Jurassic Park Comments (You must Login to Comment)

1 Indeed. When the original actors do not want to come back to a certain film, that is usually a sign. -- Submitted By: (PYLrulz) on May 1, 2015, 10:46 pm - (0 votes) - Login to Vote
2 Jurassic World should not exist. It's just cashing in on a franchise. In fact, it's a disrespect to the source material considering nobody from the previous films are even bothering to return. They know better. -- Submitted By: (Infyrin) on April 21, 2015, 4:49 pm - (1 votes) - Login to Vote
3 Crystal Skul wasn't that bad. George Lucas just has such a hard on for CGI, that I'm sure Steven Speilberg had no choice. Even if thar was as bad as many think it was, most everything else he has been in charge of, has been pretty much solid gold, if not close to it. I'll give a 4th JP a chance -- Submitted By: (PYLrulz) on July 25, 2011, 8:03 pm - (0 votes) - Login to Vote
4 There is potential in a Jurassic Park sequel, but they really need to make it DIFFERENT. The others were all so formulaic. A really scary R-rated Jurassic Park would be great. (They'll never do this, though.) Also, would it kill them to do a JP movie without an annoying kid character? -- Submitted By: (Travoltron) on July 25, 2011, 3:54 pm - (0 votes) - Login to Vote
5 Two words PYLrulz: 'Crystal Skull'. In other words, make it a 50-50 bet this will be worth even surfing upon on free cable in X number of years much less paying full cinema price for. -- Submitted By: (Pelirojo) on July 25, 2011, 12:26 pm - (0 votes) - Login to Vote
6 Well, if Speilberg is fully in charge, I would give it a shot, since normally everything he touches turns to solid gold when it comes to movies, plus it has been several years since the debacle that was the third installment of the series. -- Submitted By: (PYLrulz) on July 25, 2011, 6:06 am - (0 votes) - Login to Vote
7 Ladies and gentlemen it would appear that Mr. Spielberg has announced a 4th installment to this already "boned" franchise. It is set to be released within 2-3 years. All I can say is why. -- Submitted By: (Jp) on July 24, 2011, 7:35 pm - (0 votes) - Login to Vote
8 1 is a classic and 2 is good in its own way as well. But 3 was weak. -- Submitted By: (cfc2011) on October 5, 2010, 8:29 am - (0 votes) - Login to Vote
9 Third movie was certainly the boning moment. I mean, the T-rex losing to the Spinosaurus just wasn't right, the search for the missing kid was contrived at best - I doubt Crichton would have approved of that kind of story line if he had any say in the matter (I doubt he did). -- Submitted By: (BigAl) on July 30, 2010, 7:25 am - (0 votes) - Login to Vote
10 The third movie was definitely the boning point. JP2 was still entertaining but not groundbreaking like the first. But it was getting old choosing to have a subset of the original crew in each sequel. I'm surprised they don't bring back the kids in the 4th one (the girl, fortunately, left show biz and became a successful painter in real life and did not suffer child star doom). -- Submitted By: (ocfernan) on October 1, 2009, 5:21 pm - (0 votes) - Login to Vote
11 The first film was visual stunning because of the new technology used in it. But the second film was more like they never read the source material but instead rehashed footage not used for the first film and then borrowed from the "Carnasaur" script for the second half. -- Submitted By: (meQal) on May 6, 2009, 9:58 am - (0 votes) - Login to Vote
12 I agree with Robert. Part 1 ruled and didn't need a sequel, and certainly not The Lost World. The Lost World just wasn't much fun. But TLW is a wonderful masterpiece compared to the wretched joke "Jurassic Park 3". I'll just stick to the first movie! -- Submitted By: (Spooky) on May 4, 2009, 10:10 pm - (0 votes) - Login to Vote
13 The first movie was awesome. This was back when computer animation was groundbreaking, instead of being done to bloody death. The lifelike dinosaurs sent shivers down your spine as they prowled the park, roared, screeched, and attacked people. The Lost World was ok, but it doesn't hold a candle to the first movie. (The man being trodden on and stuck to the T-Rex's foot as he chases the people still haunts me to this day). The third one? How many times are these people going to reuse the plot where the cast accepts invitations to dinosaur-ridden areas only for disaster to strike? The only thing I give them credit for is using dinosaurs not seen in the first or second movies. Otherwise, once again, the third movie in a series proves to bone the fish. Provided the second movie fails to do so. -- Submitted By: (Robert) on May 3, 2009, 12:10 pm - (0 votes) - Login to Vote
14 First, please spare us the 4th movie, have some respect for Circhton's memory. The 2nd movie was certainly the dropping off point for the movie, they took a fair (not as good as the original of course) book and turned into environmentalist propaganda. -- Submitted By: (gpshaw) on April 15, 2009, 8:42 pm - (0 votes) - Login to Vote
15 The first two movies were good. Lost World did a worse job following the book, but it was forgivable. Part three was terrible and far-fetched. -- Submitted By: (MCS) on April 5, 2009, 6:50 pm - (0 votes) - Login to Vote

Login to See the QUICK COMMENT Box


Log in to BTF

Register - Forgot password?

Follow on Twitter!

App on Facebook


Related eBay Auctions

Powered By: TempusMedia - (Page load took:0.628 seconds)